Planck's personal paradox
At the end of the 1920s Bohr, Heisenberg and Pauli had worked out the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, but it was rejected by Planck, as well as Schrödinger, Laue, and Einstein. Planck expected that wave mechanics would soon render quantum theory—his own child—unnecessary. This was not to be the case, however. Further work only cemented quantum theory, even against his and Einstein's philosophical revulsions. Planck experienced the truth of his own earlier observation from his struggle with the older views in his younger years: "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
See: Max Planck
The Crab Nebula is a perfect example of the perceptual blindness
that is maintained within the consensus box that imprisons the mind into
mythological doctrines that rarely reflect the real world outside the box of the
consensus so-called science. The consensus box is prison for science, because
the leading edge breakthrough of advanced discovery unfold in realms that no one
has trod before, far outside the box of consensus.
Within the box of the
consensus the phenomenon of gravity has
been discovered back in the days of Johannes Kepler. Once it became accepted it
ruled the consensus to the point that everything in the universe is now seen as
the casual result of the force of gravity. But the force of gravity is not the
only force in the Universe. In fact it is the weakest force, and an top of that,
its effect diminishes with the square of the distance. Outside the box of consensus
the electric force has been discovered to also apply to the Universe
as a universal force, instead of applying only to the minute realm nuclear
physics. Vast electric phenomena are observed throughout the universe, but since
electricity in space is not recognized within the box of academic consensus (even though it is routinely measured by NASA in numerous different ways) the
entire perception of the universe is squeezed within the box of consensus where
only gravity is acknowledged as a universal force.
boxed in perception of the Crab Nebula
On this basis, within the
consensus box that limits academia the
phenomena observed in Crab Nebula become an enigma that only the magic of
super-dense matter and black holes can explain, and which fails even at that so
that the Crab remains an enigma to the very day when seen from inside the box.
Within the Crab, which is several light years across, we see phenomena happening,
changing simultaneously in a short period of time over an area is the light years
across. If light cannot travel fast enough to cause the vast
phenomena that we see happening, the entire Crab phenomenon remains an enigma.
NASA - the heart of the Crab Nebula seen in X-ray light by Chandra x-ray telescope
When perception is allowed to 'stray' outside the box
of the gravity-only academic consensus it becomes immediately apparent that
electric phenomena are common throughout the Universe where they reflect the
long discovered principles of the electromagnetic force that is measured to be
39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity and does not diminish with the
square of the distance, but only in a linear manner, which creates a huge
difference in effect, especially on the cosmic scale. Thus, when the Crab Nebula
is seen on this platform where a large portion of reality is no longer banished
from sight, the Crab becomes a very simple phenomenon that has not only numbers
reflections throughout the Universe, but can also be replicated in the laboratory
with real physical experiments. Here, outside the box, the Crab comes to light
as simple resonating plasma phenomenon that occurs in a Birkeland current that
is typically in the order of a light year wide, or wider in larger phenomena. In
the resonance of such a system that is light-years wide, the wave phenomenon
occurs simulations over the entire cross section of the resonating current. On
this platform where another increment of reality is included in the perception
(outside the box of consensus academia), the enigma of the Crab becomes a simple
structure and a not uncommon one.
Crab Nebula - an enigma in the box
Max Planck paradox continues
science is boxed in to the point that the strongest universal forces of the
universe, the electric force and its manifest the magnetic force, are omitted
a blindness in perception results that becomes universally paradoxical to the
point that the perception becomes mythological and reality becomes banished.
Then people say, when confronted, "don't waste my time with
reality." - I speak for experience here. Evidently that has become a
common occurrence in modern time, as a writer laments in an article
referencing the electric nature of the Universe:
been said that the greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance but the
illusion of knowledge. Too often the things we think we know obstruct the
things we need to learn.
20th century, the luminaries of theoretical science forged a picture of the
universe that seemed somehow complete and inarguable. From subatomic physics
to the life sciences, from planetary science to astronomy, astrophysics, and
cosmology, the 'big picture' of the natural world left little room for doubt.
Or so it seemed.
popular cosmology stirs public imagination with weird and wonderful
possibilities, all based on mathematics far beyond the interest or
comprehension of most mortals. Working forward from a conjectured primordial
state, the theorists would have us believe that they have solved the primary
riddles of the cosmos; that they are on the verge of completing a 'theory of
otherwise. Modern theory is not impregnable, and all is not well in the
sciences. Space age engineers have indeed achieved unprecedented advances, and
theoreticians have basked in the resultant glow of public attention. But in
this environment a decades-old scientific myth froze into dogma that
progressively excluded uncomfortable facts and counter-arguments. By the end
of the 20th century, the illusion became 'reality' and the voices of
critics--present in considerable numbers--were no longer heard.
will be up to historians of science to show how this occurred. To make our
case we need only consider discoveries readily accessible to working
scientists and to all who have remained skeptical in the face of supposedly
settled questions. As we intend to show, the fatal mistake of standard
cosmology is its dismissal of electricity in space. Devotion to an
electrically neutral, gravity-driven universe has turned cosmology into a
playground for mathematicians. And this turn of events was possible only
because today's cosmologists lack the training to see the most compelling
message of the space age--that we live in an electric universe.
years, the scientific media have bombarded the public with intriguing answers
to these big-picture questions. The themes are familiar even to the most
casual observers of scientific commentary. Cosmologists speak confidently of
the Big Bang that set the clock ticking and the universe on its course 13.7
billion years ago. This is a universe filled with black holes, dark matter,
dark energy, and other incomprehensible objects and forces, all with one thing
in common: they remain unseen and inaccessible under known laws of physics.
each new discovery, the 'Big Bang' universe grows increasingly bizarre,
inviting parodies that underscore the question many working scientists have
hesitated to ask: can anyone make real sense of this? The popular science
fiction writer, Terry Pratchett, satirized the cosmological creation event:
"In the beginning there was nothing--which exploded." When another
science fiction writer, Douglas Adams, conjured an 'Infinite Improbability
Drive,' the object of his wit was today's probabilistic quantum mechanics
theory, which disconnects cause from effect. This theoretical approach has
opened the door to every imaginable violation of physical laws, culminating in
what many now claim to be the greatest scientific embarrassment of the
twentieth century-'string theory.' "Where are the surrealist-art critics
of science?" one humorist asked.
Faith in Gravity
insist that the weakest force known to science-gravity- controls the universe.
Early in the twentieth century, Einstein redefined Newtonian gravity by adding
a metaphysical framework. He combined the three measurable physical dimensions
of space with a mathematical 'dimension' that cannot be measured with the same
ruler: time. The claimed success of Einstein's 'thought experiments'
encouraged mathematicians to follow his lead, and they have dominated physics
and cosmology ever since.
must be said that Einstein himself showed integrity by doubting his own work.
But his followers have shown no such restraint. In their devotion to
mathematical abstractions, cosmologists wrote themselves a blank check, with
the freedom to invent anything necessary to save the theory when observations
middle of the twentieth century, astronomers were shocked to discover
unimaginable concentrations of energy in deep space. Limited to gravitational
models, they could only envision super-massive, super-compact objects hidden
from view. So they suspended observed laws of physics to allow for 'black
holes.' On discovering galactic motions that directly contradicted
gravitational models, astronomers imagined vast regions of invisible 'dark
matter.' Since no one could see it, they were free to place it wherever needed
to preserve appearances. Then, when other dubious assumptions led them to
think that the universe is expanding ever faster--the ultimate violation of
gravitational dogma--they resorted to 'dark energy,' an exotic force neither
witnessed nor understood, but supposedly dominating cosmic motions.
the 'queen of the sciences.' modern cosmology has imposed boundaries on all
related disciplines, with disastrous consequences. How did the Sun and its
planetary satellites arise? Theory required stars to accrete gravitationally
from diffuse nebular clouds, lighting a nuclear furnace hidden in their cores.
From the residual disk of equatorial material, the theory says, planets and
moons slowly congealed, together with a horde of lesser rocks moving around
the Sun as meteors, asteroids, and comets.
these assumptions, it was no great leap to write the history of our solar
system. If gravity rules, the planets have surely moved on regular and
predictable orbits for billions of years--a tranquil backdrop for the geologic
and biologic evolution of Earth, punctuated only by random impacts from space.
the force of 'reasoning from the top down,' the clockwork solar system also
set firm limits to our understanding of human origins, the history of
consciousness, and the rise of civilization. In the uneventful solar system of
theory, the present became the guide to the past. The sky above our early
ancestors must have been virtually identical to what we observe today. A mere
speculation thus deprived historians, archeologists, and anthropologists of a
desperately needed incentive. It permitted them to ignore the universal
testimony of early cultures that the sky once looked vastly different.
Scholars investigating the human past did not realize that this submission to
the cosmologists' creed only added to the cost of misdirection in the
New View of the Universe
a new breed of scientist is challenging modern cosmology at the level of its
underpinnings. Researchers standing on the shoulders of unsung twentieth
century giants of science (including several Nobel Laureates) are
investigating the plasma universe. They remind us that interplanetary,
interstellar, and intergalactic space is filled with plasma, a medium that
continually defies astronomers' expectations.
is distinguished by the presence of charged particles, and the freely moving
electrons in plasma are efficient carriers of electric currents. For today's
innovators, electricity is the key to understanding the never-ending surprises
of the space age. The patchwork of modern cosmology is unnecessary, these
researchers tells us. They do not follow abstract reasoning from the top down.
Their understanding arises from experiment and direct observation.
by comparing plasma behavior in the laboratory to patterns seen in space. And
their insights have consistently succeeded in predicting the path of discovery
where standard cosmology has failed.
with advanced computer simulations and the most powerful electrical discharges
that can be produced on Earth, these investigators are now pointing the way to
a new and revolutionary vision of the universe.
above is article by By Wallace Thornhill and David Talbott "Introducing
The Electric Universe" see: RENSE.COM
Also see related articles: Thunderbolts
archive and Holoscience
greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance but the illusion of knowledge"
statement of the above article defines today's stage to a large degree short of
exposing the danger inherent in knowledge that is incomplete. Incomplete
knowledge boxes the mind in with assumptions that create barriers behind which
impossible situations arise that cannot be resolved or understood behind the
barriers. Incomplete knowledge creates paradoxes. When the paradoxes cannot be
resolved the mind regresses towards a more infantile state where doctrines
In the case
of Ptolemy, a religious doctrine about the nature of the heavens imposed a
paradox. The doctrine decreed that with the "heavens being perfect the
orbits of the planets must be on the path of perfect circles, orbiting the less
perfect Earth. The trouble was that the evidence didn't match the assumption.
With astronomy being put into a box by the doctrine since was employed to interpret
the evidence, to make it fit the doctrine. On this platform Ptolemy created the
is an imaginary circle that a planet was deemed to orbit, which was itself
riding on a circle that is centered on an imaginary point in space which lies
half-way between the Earth and another imaginary point in space that he called
the "equant." With these two fudge factors, the epicycle and the
equant, Ptolemy actually able to create a platform for understanding the motion
of planets that came amazingly close to what was actually observed. The
knowledge thus created had ruled astronomy for 1500 years till Johannes Kepler
(1571 - 1630) broke out of the box and saw in the motions of the planets
the expression of the principle of universal gravity. With this discovery the
rule of the epicycle that had actually begun to some degree with Aristotle,
ended. It didn't end instantly, but it ended. Kepler wrote:
eighteen months after the first light, three months after the true day, but a
very few days after the pure Sun of that most wonderful study began to shine,
nothing restrains me; it is my pleasure to taunt mortal men with the candid
acknowledgment that I am stealing the golden vessels of the Egyptians to build
a tabernacle to my God from them, far, far away from the boundaries of Egypt.
If you forgive me, I shall rejoice; if you are enraged with me, I shall bear
it. See, I cast the die, and I write the book. Whether it is to be read by the
people of the present or of the future makes no difference: let it await its
reader for a hundred years, if God Himself has stood ready for six thousand
years for one to study Him. -- Johannes
Kepler, Book V, Harmony of the World
(also see: Animating Creativity )
challenge remains before us, to break out of the box created by incomplete
knowledge. The world of science still abounds with 'epicycles' of many types
that have been conjured up for the same old purpose to make the evidence fit the
doctrine in order to keep the boxed in system of modern academia alive. The
modern epicycles have different names of course, dark energy, dark matter, black
holes, including the big-bang explosion that caused the universe to be. The
epicycles of dark energy, dark matter, and so forth are needed to explain
observed phenomena in the universe within the box from which 99.99% of the
Universe is omitted. The epicycles rule in the tiny box where every phenomenon
must be explained exclusively from the platform of gravitational interaction.
Since this doesn't work in most cases, fudge factors are invented in order to
make the results come out right. The tragedy is that this platform of 'science'
that bases everything on incomplete perceptions is enormously expensive as it
leads to tragic conclusions and tragic policies and closes the door to
progressive discoveries. Indeed, why would one not expect such tragedies when
one's perception of the Universe is based on the weakest force in the Universe
that diminishes with the square of the distance, with the exclusion of the
strongest force that is 39 orders of magnitude stronger and diminishes only in a
linear relationship with distance? Indeed, how could one expect to have an even
remotely close concept of reality when one omits 99.99% of the Universe in
one's consideration? The results are tragic indeed.
results of banishing 99.99% of the Universe
the Universe, possibly more, exists in a state called plasma. In plasma, the
protons and electrons that are the basic building blocks of atoms exist in an
unbound state, or in some cases in a partially bund state. With the protons and
electrons being endowed with an electric charge they respond to the principles
of the universal electric force. When the force they react to sets them into
motion, their movement creates a magnetic force. The combined effect is called
the electromagnetic force. This force is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than
gravity, has an infinite range like gravity, but unlike gravity that diminishes
with the square of the distance, the electromagnetic force diminishes only in a linear
relationship with distance. This makes a huge difference, especially in galactic
and intergalactic environment where the distances are extremely large. On this
huge scale the weak force of gravity that diminishes with square of the distance
plays no role at all. Here everything operates according to the principles of
the electric force.
begins when academic quackery tries to envision the Universe without its
operating forces on a platform where only gravity rules. That's when we get into
such mythological perceptions as the "density wave" theory. These
perceptions result from the frustrating task of having to interpret the Universe
without the very force that gives it its shape. The process is like a kid making
excuses for why it didn't show up in school, and the excuses have nothing to do
with what really happened.
"density wave" theory is tragic, for it has nothing to do with
reality. Being thus 'free' of reality the wildest projects suddenly become
possible such as the 62 million year mass-extinction cycle theory that is
presently brought to the political scene with massive apocalyptical predictions
of earthquakes and mass extinctions and so on, including the great 2012
apocalypse that supposedly ends everything as we know it. The "density
wave" theory has the solar system orbiting through imaginary
super-high-density regions of stars in the galaxy with apocalyptic consequences.
The same theory also has the solar system bobbing up and down above and below
the galactic equator, even above and below the galactic disk, thereby becoming super exposed
to cosmic radiation with mass extinction consequences. When the question is
posed how these strange proposed movements of the solar system are possible, the
answer is also "the density wave." When asked how the "density
wave" is possible, dark matter is brought to the scene, and so the excuses
become evermore convoluted. It doesn't seen to matter that a 62 million year
cycle isn't even possible in a density wave galaxy with the currently known
orbital speeds. Nor does it seem to matter to the theory of the up and down
bobbing solar system that the solar system is currently no where near the stated
extreme that apocalyptic predictions are based on. The solar system is presently
located 16–98 ly from the central plane of the galactic disc that is itself 1000
light years thick, far distant from the environments that are deemed apocalyptic
by the density wave dogma. When reality is banished all sorts of things are possible.
Density Wave vs Electric Cycles - science boxed in by a myth
The universe outside the box
When seen outside the tiny
box of perception in which everything is reduced to gravity and related
mythologies by which reality becomes increasingly less of a factor, the real
universe comes to light as radically different. Instead of being seen as an
entropic universe that is self-consuming, as in the case of the fusion sun that
consumes its fuel and burns out, the universe outside this box is seen as
self-powered by inexhaustible energy streams that are plasma electric in nature
by which the universe is self-expanding and thereby anti-entropic in nature.
Outside of the boxed-in view the history of the Earth and the solar system look
radically different, with interconnections far beyond the reach of gravity. In
this wider view the solar system becomes a part of a wider system of stars and
star systems, within which the Earth has its own and rather turbulent history
together with all the stars the solar system has acquired. On this wider
platform the large extinction events in the Earth's history come to light as
resulting from radically different causes that are not mathematically cyclical
in nature, but are resulting from the nature of unfolding process.
See: Constructing the Solar
million year event
While the long galactic and extragalactic
cycles (62 and 144 million year cycles) shape the evolutionary processes, it is
rare that they are the cause for extinction events. In fact, only one such cause
can be recognized with relative certainty, which resulted from the deep glaciation
440 million years ago when the 62 million year cycle and the 144 million year
cycle of electric density (and climate warmth) were both at a minimum point.
Evidence in sediment records tells us that the simultaneous deep low of the 62 and 144 million year
cycles was a singular event in history of our planet. The records also indicate
that the same overlapping is in the process of repeating itself in the current timeframe
where the process became expressed with the
start of the Pleistocene ice age epoch that began 2 million years ago.
Thus we find
again in a situation in which the 62 million year cycle, and the 144 million year cycle, of electric
density and corresponding climate warmth are both falling off towards their minimum point.
If we consider the length
of the lower half of the down-portion of 62 million year cycle being coincident
with the Pleistocene ice age, the Pleistocene will likely
extend for 7 million years in duration, (with 5 more to go) with its deepest point being
reached in 1.5 million years from the present.
overlapping of the long galactic and comic electric density cycles is the only life-threatening event
on the Earth's horizon that is caused by
galactic and cosmic forces acting in the present. And this is happening now. The
Earth has been in an Ice Age epoch for 2 million years or glaciation cycles that
have their own 100,000 year resonance that potentially reflects the electromagnetic
cycle time of a galaxy that is 100,000 light years wide.
society dreams of a world
that isn't real - a world of global warming, a mechanistic world in which the
return of the current 100,000 year glaciation cycle is deemed to be still a
thousand, or thousands of years away, too far for anyone's concern - the real
world outside of the box of dogmas doesn't match those dreams. Inside the box everything is
gravity oriented and mechanistically determined and the Universe and the galaxy
are electrically dead.
box where only gravity rules the current
100,000 year ice age cycles are computed to correspond with the earth's exposure
to the Sun in respect to the interacting cycles of the Earth's orbit around the
Sun, the Milankovitch Cycles. Except, just as it was the case with Ptolemy's
approximation, the result doesn't quite fit. According to the Milankovitch cycles
we should be in Ice Age conditions right now. Evidently a much larger 100,000
year galactic oscillation is involved
that by their electric nature are secondarily expressed in major elements that
make up the Milankovitch cycles.
Since the nature of
the great determining galactic and cosmic cycles is located outside of the box
in which only gravity is deemed to rule and no other factors exist, no interest stirs
the mind in the world of doctrinal academia in respect to the current danger, even
while the very existence of mankind is at stake, and the danger is
conditions are a critical factor in a world like ours where our very existence
depends on agriculture that is the key element of our food infrastructure.
Nobody lives without food. When agriculture dies, mankind dies with it. No take
a look at the few green areas where the major agriculture in the world is
NASA - blue marble
agriculture in North America is located in a 'small area north of the 30th
parallel, extending in a few places as high as the 55th parallel. A large
portion of that was covered in ice during the last glaciation and the rest with
tundra conditions. When the climate down-shift begins nearly all of that area is
in danger of becoming lost to the world's food production infrastructure. The
rest of the word is in a similar situation.
NASA - blue marble
Eurasian continent the major food production area is located north of the 40th
parallel, with China, India, Australia, and Africa being barely being able to
support themselves. The big food production areas are stretched out along a narrow
band in the north that are the first to be affected.
sharp downturn begins towards ice age conditions the entire northern band will
be affected simultaneously with potential crop losses of fifty percent. The
resulting food deficiency could wipe out half of mankind in short order starting
a mass extinction. If this happens, it would be the first voluntary mass
extinction in the history of our planet.
extinction events the affected species had no choice before them to escape the
tragedy as we have today. We have the technological capability to relocate our
potentially endangered agriculture into the tropics, or protect it in vast indoor
facilities, and make the world food-sufficient at the same time.
question before us, driven by astrophysical factors, is whether will we do what
is necessary to protect not only our own future, but together that of all mankind.
Astrophysical factors are global factors. No nation stands isolated from their
impact. Right now, the collective answer of mankind to the most critical
question of our time is, "Nay." In world that is boxed in by
short-sighted dogmatic academia the cosmic factors are deemed not to exist. In a
world of dreams about global warming, a nuclear fusion sun, and a solar system
that has not changed for 'eternity' the collective answer to the ice age
question is complete indifference, for the world outside the boxed-in
perceptions is deemed not to exist.
hope that Max Planck was wrong
dawn of a new ice age before us and the need to escape the dangerous
boxed-in perceptions, the paradox that Max Plack faced comes into view again,
which he stated as a postulate. "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
Let us hope
that Max Planck was mistaken, because we simply don't have the luxury anymore to
wait for the death of the current generation for society to become free of its
boxed-in perceptions. The ice age imperative is here now. We are in the
transition zone. While no one can predict the day or year when the transition
starts, or know whether it hasn't started already, we cannot escape the fact
that the transition is near. We have numerous warning balls ringing.
discovered that the solar heliosphere has been progressively 'collapsing' (by
20% to date) over the last 50 years, as the solar wind pressure that forms it
has become less dense. As a consequence the cosmic-ray flux as increased in
density with the resulting increase is cloud formation. As a lawful consequence
of that, the Earth has been getting cooler. A sharp drop in year-average temperature
has been recorded at the Solar Terrestrial Institute in Irkutsk from 1998 onward.
Record cold winters have been reported all over the world. All of these are the natural
effect of the reduced density of the plasma electric
currents that power our solar system and the Sun. What we see fully reflects the
expected pattern of the 100,000 years oscillation that give us the cyclical interglacial
periods, like the current one in which our culture developed.
One of the
tragedies of our global culture is that it grew out of a time of huge
astrophysical events that for the lack of scientific knowledge inspired a large
arena of religious mysticism that created the boxed in culture of dogmas. This
trend has been exploited by political motivation for the protection of empire
against scientific and technological progress. With empire itself being a
dogmatic system that depends on the boxed in mentality for its very existence,
it is not surprising that the masters of empire, especially from the time of Paolo
Sarpi onward to the present day, have kept science boxed in with mysticism along
the Ortes, Maltus, Darwin, Huxley, Fabian axis and its modern extensions. It was
this axis of intentional anti-science action that conjured up the Big Bang
mysticism with its dark matter, dark energy, and black hole cosmology that
neatly fits into the box of an electric-dead universe where gravity is the only
causative force allowed by the dogmas of the box.
fusion-sun and fusion-energy mysticism are elements created by the dogmas of the
box. They are clever answers to the limits imposed by the perception of a
universe that is devoid of its self-powering energy in the form of plasma
electric currents. And they are entropic concepts. Everything in the box is an
entropic concept, ruled by the king, the second law of thermodynamics. On the
galactic level the density wave doctrine governs the scene in the box, complete
with its attached apocalyptical mysticism and cyclical extinction mysticism.
for breaking the Fabian entropic box
statesman and economist Lyndon LaRouche may have started such a trend. His work
of the last 35 years in researching the history of empires and their mastery of
the box, and his presenting the concept that there is a whole world outside the box
possible, and bright one at that, has caused a lot of people to look a little
further than the limits imposed by the boxed-in dogmas such as monetarism, imperialism,
fascism, terrorism, and so on. He displayed the world outside the box in
contrast with all the mess inside it that is presently destroying the economies
of the world and their financial system, and also their culture and physical
have also had this kind of effect on science in perhaps the only manner in which the box can
be broken without waiting for another generation to die out. LaRouche has
put the inside of the box on full display, perhaps to illustrate its absurdity -
including the density-wave doctrine and its attached apocalyptic mysticism, and
also the doctrine that the next glaciation cycle is far off, and that fusion
power production is possible and is near.
LaRouche's exposure of the inside of the box is intentional or is just another
case of the blind leading the blind is unknown, but his immense effort in
exposing the box does have a dramatically sobering effect as it exposes the
absurdity of the box, and the danger to mankind and civilization resulting from it remaining
inside this barrier to perception and discoveries. In this sense Lyndon LaRouche is setting the stage for accomplishing
what Max Planck hadn't dared to image to be possible, a breakout from the box on
all fronts simultaneously, and this to be accomplished within our generation. With this
breakout that might yet become possible with LaRouche standing in the
foreground, rests the future of all mankind, and not just its hope.
In the field
of economics Lyndon LaRouche has broken out of the box of consensus academia,
leading a fight that now spans 35 years to lift the world out of the
stranglehold of the consensus box where what is deemed economic force, is ruled by the king of
liberal imperial private monetarism. In the field of astrophysics and to some
degree physics the speeches of Lyndon LaRouche and of the LPAC science basement
team that he had organized, reveal the great pioneer's still tightly boxed-in perception to entropic cosmology where
gravity rules as king and the electric force is banished from entering
perceptions. But there is cause for hope apparent that the situation will change
in the near future as all paths to cosmic reality converge at the realization
that the 99.999% of the mass of the Universe exists in electrically charged
plasma responding to the electric force that is the strongest universal force in
existence with a near infinite range, in comparison with gravity that is primarily
a local force as in the 'small' spaces of planetary systems, such as ours around
intention vs lagging response
occasions the LPAC basement science team has commented on the Crab Nebula for
example, as seen from the platform of conventional perceptions, They recognized that what is
being observed in the Crab Nebula should not be possible, so that something is obviously
missing from the platform of perception. This recognition is a step forward. But
from this forward position to the actual breaking out of the box that created
the paradox in the first place, the footsteps become increasingly difficult to
As stated at
the beginning of this article, Max Planck is said to have expected that wave mechanics
would soon render the quantum theory—his own child—unnecessary. It was said that
he found that further work only cemented the quantum theory more firmly, even against his own and
also against Einstein's philosophical revulsions. The mathematics had created a
box that he couldn't break out of. In the days of Planck and Einstein the
evidence of the world outside the box was faint and spasmodic in comparison with
the flood of evidence that is available today with the aid of space telescopes
and satellite science probes. The door out of the box has been opened wide by
these modern efforts, but to step beyond the threshold appears to remain as difficult
as it always had been. It is not a small mental step to lay the 'epicycles'
aside by which a dogma was made believable. When Kepler achieved his breakout, he broke
one and a half millennia of boxed-in preconceptions. It took that long for
mankind to take this single step across the barrier of learned ignorance. In
today's world we don't have the luxury of waiting another one and a half
millennia for academia to accept that there is a whole world past the open door.
defenders of the faith in science mythology are many, there remains hope that
the situation will change in the near future. Lyndon LaRouche and the basement
team that he has organized have spoken for years about a universe that is anti-entropic, that doesn't
run down but is self-expanding. These pioneers stood against the whole world that hails
the second law of thermodynamics as absolute, that champions the black art
science, that of the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, and black holes in space,
and they are still standing as champions of the breakout movement from the box.
Nevertheless while the pioneers speak of anti-entropy in a philosophical manner they are still stuck
to some degree in the box of consensus-science where everything is
the world-view in all respects. Everything is deemed to be winding down. Empire
needs it that way. Nevertheless our immediate world is non-entropic. Every atom
is essentially a non-entropic energetic system that never stops. If it did the
Universe would vanish. But the universe is more than a just-existing entity. It
developing and growing. It is actively anti-entropic and is universally powered
under this principle. This power is greater than fusion. It is electric,
unbounded, and infinite in its reach, and inexhaustible. It is reflected by the
anti-entropic nature of life.
In the cosmology
that is conceived without electricity everything is entropic,
self-consuming, self-collapsing. The fusion-sun is entropic and with it is the
resulting perception of the
Universe. The defenders of the modern faith are committed to entropy. They are committed
to prevent any breakout from
the box that the existence of empire depends on. They are 'enslaved' to do this in order to choke the very
notion that the Universe is rationally comprehensible and is actively and
universally self-powered without nuclear fusion furnaces in stars, and black
holes in the galaxies, and dark energy.
Huxley and his Fabian friends in the Royal Society would all praise the modern world
of science. They would award its disciples the grand price for excellence at mental
self-imprisonment. Nevertheless empire is far from being secure. It is
entropic itself by its very nature, so that the age of empire is ending. With
its end now near, mankind requires a sure foundation with science based on truth, to
rebuild the world that empire has torn down. For this, the breakout from the box
of consensus-science that keeps a large portion of the Universe (the universal
electric force and its energy) off limits, is
parable of the cave is still unfolding
factor in today's world is not a contest between ideologies. It is a contest of truth vs mythology.
If Planck and Einstein had seen the evidence of the electric nature of the
astrophysical Universe that we see today they would likely have jumped out of
the box that academia hails today, which they themselves had hailed, even countering their own philosophical
is the story of a people who have been held prisoner in a cave deep inside a
mountain. They have been there for so long that the cave has gradually become
the only world they know.
prisoners are laid in chains that are fastened behind a wall in the cave, facing
the rear of the cavern. This rock encrusted world is the only world they know.
The only light they can see is the light from a fire that is maintained on the
other side of the wall, which is reflected off the rocks of the cavern in front
of them, and above them. In this manner, their world has become a world of a
faint glow of light and of huge shadows of objects that are passed in front of
the fire. The shadows, which they all see with their senses can, thus become a
reality to them that in part defines their world, that they react to.
manages to break away from the chains, stand up and cautiously raise himself
above the wall. With great amazement he begins to observe the process that
creates the shadows. The person who experiences this 'awakening' becomes free in
more than one sense. This self-freed prisoner sees the fire, and also sees the
objects that have created the magnified shadow images. The so freed prisoner
begins to understand that the mythology of the world they had created for
themselves was not real, but was merely a construct of their deduction resulting
from the limitations of their perception.
doesn't leave it with that. A diffused glow of daylight is visible also. But is
the self-freed prisoner willing to follow its promise that is but a faint glow?
Plato suggests that he would not. He supposes that if "someone should drag
him by force, up the rough ascend, the steep way up, and never stop until he
could drag him out into the light of the sun, would he not be distressed and
furious?... and when he came into the light, the brilliance would fill his eyes
and he would not be able to see one of the things now called real."
(Plato's The Republic, book VII)
profound allegory Plato illustrates the challenge that we all face, to resolve
the great paradoxes. We live in a world of human thought that is defined by the
limitations of what our senses are able to behold, and by the finity of the
imaginary worlds that deduce from what we thus see. We bow to the shadows that
the limited senses tell us is the reality of our universe. But when the pioneer
of which there are still far too few, like the prisoner, breaks free from the
chains that bind its existence by binding movement of perception - when he
understands and acknowledges the process that causes the shadows, and he begins
to understand the processes of the real world that other pioneers before him
have discovered, then the whole cave experience becomes little more than just a
shadow of a bad dream.
parable Plato defines the universal principle for civilization to free itself
from imperial private monetarism and delimited science and culture, resulting in
economic collapse, cultural regression, and mental infancy. By its very nature
empire champions both of the tragic forces, monetarism and delimited science.
Plato's cave illustrates both the nature of empire and the innate nature of the
human being to free itself from mythologies.
times mythology developed when major astrophysical events that we no longer see
today had dominated the sky, which for the lack of scientific knowledge were
deemed images of gods, which often were associated also with natural disasters
for which cause the gods were feared. The masters of empire built on this trend
with their own brand of impressive 'pomp and circumstance' combined with
terrorism and slavery, and with delimited science and culture being promoted to
keep the cave in operation. All of these fronts are now wearing thin, including
the mysticism that stands behind them.
would see our world today would he cry, being moved to tears by the tragedies
that society is inflicting on one another? Or would he rejoice that there is a
stirring in progress in the cave towards an impending exodus and the end of the
While the technology does not yet exist that
enables mankind to tap into the galactic electric energy that surrounds our
planet, which is evident in so many ways, a breakout can be enabled that gets the needed development started. One
of the big blocking factors against the technological breakout, is the iron-clad hold on science that the masters of
empire still exercise, who would loose their control over mankind if real scientific
development was beginning to happen. However, with empire being entropic, and
mankind anti-entropic in nature, a crossover will occur that reshapes the world,
and this is in progress already. We are in the boundary zone.
Energy visible on Earth
Energy visible in the Sun
Energy visible in the solar system
Energy visible in the galaxy - apocalypse NO!
Ice age YES!
Energy visible in the cosmos
to Know the Truth
more on empire, universe, energy, NASA, science, NAWAPA, music, world
with LPAC videos on the Nation, Science, Economics, and Empire
index - Home